News Briefs: Macomb County to Remove 6,000 Tons of Sediment From Sewer

Also in this week's sewer and water news, a vandal wreaks havoc at Winnipeg's water treatment plant, causing estimated damages between $4 million and $5 million

News Briefs: Macomb County to Remove 6,000 Tons of Sediment From Sewer

Macomb County in Michigan is in the process of removing approximately 6,000 tons of sediment from the Macomb Interceptor Drain, a critical sewer line. 

The sediment buildup in the 11-foot-diameter concrete pipe, located 60 feet underground, has reduced the system's sewage flow capacity. Officials trace the blockage back to a 2016 sinkhole incident in Fraser, which led to the collapse of part of the interceptor.

The project, estimated to cost $37 million, is considered crucial as failure to address the sediment buildup could result in the sewer line's collapse. This would affect nearly 600,000 residents across 11 communities in Macomb County. 

Winnipeg Treatment Plant Vandal Causes Millions in Damages

A man recently wreaked havoc at Winnipeg's water treatment plant, causing estimated damages between $4 million and $5 million.

The suspect broke into the plant's vehicle yard and commandeered an excavator, which he used to damage multiple buildings and vehicles.

Authorities have since caught the 39-year-old Winnipeg resident, who now faces multiple charges. A report reveals that one building at the facility sustained significant structural damage, and 15 city-owned vehicles are expected to be written off. The city is currently conducting a full security audit of the water treatment facility.

Vermont Resumes Use of Biosolids-Based Topsoil

Vermont's Department of Transportation has lifted a temporary ban on the use of biosolids-based manufactured topsoil for its construction projects. The moratorium was initially instituted due to concerns over PFAS that could be present in the biosolids. 

After extensive reviews and stakeholder discussions, the department has resumed the use of MFT, but with new requirements for PFAS testing.



Discussion

Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.